Sunday, September 14, 2008

Girl Genius: Crashing Through the Glass Ceiling Face-First

Webcomics are essentially the scum of the Internet. But it's true that not all of them are abominations. From the subsewers of mediocrity arises a few hypermutants which do not immediately offend the tastes of the rest of the mutants on the E-Zone. How do we determine which ones are good? Who the fuck knows. However, I do know what doesn't work, and that's placing the choice of "best turd" in the hands of other webcartoonists.

The most recent choice for "Most Outstanding Comic" is none other than artistic travesty Girl Genius. For those of you wondering what the hell a comic called Girl Genius could possibly be about, the plot synopsis page is not going to tell you a whole lot, since the author got to what I assume was an insignificant plot point (based on what I know of shitty webcomic authors) before giving up on writing what invariably would have been a lengthy and convoluted description of what every single page had contained.

From what I can glean, though, the story is basically your standard Mary Sue character who is suddenly thrust into a high adventure world based on talents and skills she was unaware of before. She has 2 or 3 companions to round out the skill set, and she has some kind of rival and some kind of nemesis to provide varying levels of conflict and is ultimately possessed by an even more powerful force than herself. Basically the premise of every anime ever. Slap a coat of Steampunk paint on it and it becomes Girl Genius.

Despite the uninspired and hackneyed concept, Girl Genius continues to show that it does not deserve "Most Outstanding" anything with its more than sloppy art. The artist, Phil Foglio, has never seen a human face in his entire life. Eyes are not teardrop shaped, though they ARE generally the same size, and heads are not the size of a softball. And most of all, facial features should exist on the actual face, not on a plane in front of or behind the face. Of course there's rarely any consistency between characters, since faces have a tendency to change their proportions in EACH PANEL. Of course this may be a result from not planning out the art very well; as seen in the last two panels, the features are often resized to accomodate the presence of other features at such an angle.

Ultimately, when one decides who should earn the label of "Most Outstanding Webcomic," one should consider whether the artist can draw a character consistently enough to convey the concept that his characters are not made of Silly Putty. The story should be something which isn't lifted from the annals of japan, and the writing (if it is a long form comic) should be conveyed clearly and concisely to new readers. When the winner of "Most Outstanding Webcomic" is a Girl Genius with an IQ of 60, one has to wonder what the comics who chose it are like.

5 comments:

  1. GG is pretty damn good. Original setting, good story, the art's nice too and fairly unique. I hate pretty much all webcomics (fuck you VG cats!), and even I can see that. Maybe you should have actually read the thing before critisizing it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. GG is pretty damn awful. Cliched setting, godawful story, the art's terrible too and fairly unique in giving all the character downs syndrome. I hate pretty much all webcomics (fuck you VG cats!), and even I can see that. Maybe you should have actually read the thing before praising it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Meh. I have my problems with GG, but this review reads as if you haven't even read the comic. You just toss on the hate and, well, that's all. You don't go into detail or offer any great insight. It's a shame. GG is a comic that needs criticizing. I actually like the idea of it, but I think the authors got WAAAAY off track and, in the end, lost sight of any plot or sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've never been a fan of GG. It just doesn't appeal to me. That said, your review, (well not so much a review, as much as a prejudge trashing,) contained some remarkably lame criticisms.
    Say what you will about the plot line, but you seem to hold the artwork to some ridiculous personal standard.
    It's called "artistic style", Sir.
    I'd love to read your review of "Guernica" by Pablo Picasso. "Just look at this awful excuse for art! None of those things look like they're supposed to!"
    You remind me of the old saying, "Those that can, do. Those that can't, criticize."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mmm, he's right. Most heterosexual fannerds wouldn't even get past a geek-culture staple name like Foglio drawing skimpy clothes and giant jugs on the nerdy girl to notice if there's a redeeming plot. Thankfully I'm a homo, all these webcomics with women in lead roles who have "outgoing personalities" don't faze me. Considering 9/10ths of the WC world is still catering to the hetero you can pull together these sanitized and dumbed down Heavy Metal reject steam-punk goth opera pieces on next to nothing and be sure of the fact that no one will give a flying fuck if it sucks. Most of it's TL;DR, deus ex machina, hand-waving, wizard did it laziness in a sugary sweet candy floss cocoon of big-eyes, wonder-bra sized boobs, and magical Mary Sue-isms. It's boring. You can slap all the noisy, shiny crap on you want, but if you remove the cute girl/big jugs half of the nerd titillation equation, it's just -boring-.

    ReplyDelete