Sunday, January 18, 2009

Peter is the Wolf: The Most CONTROVERSIAL Review Yet!

A werewolf
In the Light of a Full Moon, Sarah Hazen Transforms into an Atrocious Webcomic.
There is nothing more reprehensible than a smutty porn comic that tries to pass itself off as something for all ages. Comics often attempt to pull this off by taking their pornographic material, and covering up small naughty bits or just removing completely graphic scenes. Unfortunately this usually results in a second-rate product for general audiences, since all of the creator's effort is being poured into the purely erotic bits. I'm not convinced that a comic can exist where two equal versions exist, where one is for scum-sucking sleazebags and the other is for the more decent population. The odds are very slim. Peter is the Wolf, (from White Lightning Productions) is the prime example of just how unlikely a concept this is. And since furries are being thrown into the mix, the odds are ever-narrowing. NOTE: I will only be discussing and linking the general version of this comic, because the porn pages are so mind-shreddingly vile that I would be charged with war crimes if I inflicted them upon you. You can switch to the adult version (at your own peril) by replacing 'general' in the URL with 'adult'.

Peter is the Wolf (written by Kris Overstreet and drawn by Benjamin "BAR-1" Rodriguez) is, at its core, a tale about werewolfs. Werewolfs, it turns out, are simply the furry equivalent of vampires, which we all know is simply a ploy to seem more mysterious. Furries have an amazingly difficult time separating their professional life from their sex life, so it goes without saying that anything I link, despite being from the general audiences version, is probably not safe to view at work, lest you get fired from your job as an actuary/test pilot/terrible webcomic reviewer. Peter is the Wolf chronicles the adventures of a werewolf, not surprisingly named Peter, who unsuspectingly turns his girlfriend into a werewolf via unprotected sex. Invariably, she turns into a 12-foot-tall werewolfess, and since this is first and foremost a porn comic, her breasts are larger than seven of her heads. Peter, an abnormally small werewolf, has the only crotch in the world capable of calming her and reverting her to her mousy human form.

Yes, that's right, the most common way to turn a ten-ton titan back to a meek, minuscule maiden is through sexual intercourse. Granted, this is a furry porn comic, so I can't say I'm that surprised, but there IS a difference between writing a porn comic for your readers, and writing one for yourself. And if anyone is the intended audience for Peter is the Wolf, it's Overstreet and Rodriguez.

A creepy smile from a creepy guy.
This Guy Knows Something You Don't
Since werewolfs (or lycanthropes, as the most anal of nerds would insist) are indicative of a transformation fetish, this comic is laden with instances of characters switching from their "wolf form" and "human form" frequently, and require the reader to make a mental note of what both forms look like for a character, and realize that they are, for the most part, interchangeable. Seriously, there are pages where a character can switch back and forth about ten times. Since there's no discernable reason for this, such behavior can come off as confusing and befuddling to the reader. Some pages are also peppered with a dramatic shot of someone spying on our pair of protagonists, but this doesn't really bear any fruit, since we have no idea who these antagonistic spies are, what their motives are, or why we should care that our dynamic duo is even being watched to begin with.

As usual, there is nothing great to say about the art. Characters are wildly inconsistent, and that's just when they try to stay on model. When BAR-1 attempts a tense, wide-eyed shot, it only serves to creep readers right out. The intended expression of shock is submerged in a sea of distorted faces and strange viewing angles. The artist takes most of his artistic cues from popular anime characters, but it's obvious that he is more comfortable drawing wolf-men than humans, judging from how skewed his people end up looking. Again, I should not act surprised. The inconsistency of human characters could also be explained by the artist's excessive cribbing of 'manga' and anime sources, since comic characters will often change proportions, but only between different artists. If this artist is trying to emulate this effect, then he is decidedly worse than the ones who draw their comic right-to-left with tall skinny speech balloons, despite the native language being English. If this is not his intent, then a study of anatomy would be the standard prescription.

Whoa jeeze that's freaky.
Yes, It's Very, Very Wrong
There a few other oddities involved with PitW's composition. On several occasions, the creators have felt it necessary to write, in large letters, "SPIELBERG" behind a surprised character. I would hazard a guess that they are trying to indicate a "spielberg moment," but I guess no one told them that a spielberg moment only occurs in film, and not comics. If you can't indicate surprise without referencing an occurrence in another medium, you really have no business making comics. Additionally, there are times when, instead of drawing backgrounds, Rodriguez has decided to simply use photographic backgrounds. This, ladies and gentlemen, is the epitome of laziness in webcomics. Using photographs for backgrounds is like using actual cardboard as the crust of a pizza. No one is gonna like that pizza.

The porn is blatantly obvious when you run into it, even in the "all-ages" version. Because the artist is lazy, he takes a shortcut--scaling the original image so that the "naughty bits" are out of frame, would work if not for one issue. Changes in resolution within an image are painfully obvious, and this kind of scaling creates a massive neon sign that says "THIS IS NOT RIGHT. SOMETHING IS WEIRD HERE." If the creators are committed to providing two versions of the comic, then they should be willing to redraw panels when necessary, instead of moving things around in Microsoft Picture Editor. While the writer could easily pull apart the important stuff and separate it from the smut, it really falls on both creators to treat both versions of their comic with the dignity it deserves. Why bother putting this stuff out there on the web if you're not going to put your best effort into it?

Personally I promised myself I would never review a porn comic, since its goals are generally not in line with my own. But when a webcomic makes an attempt to be both porn and not-porn, it has committed a violation so egregious that deserves ten times as much ridicule as it will ever receive. The use of furries is merely a giant fluorescent target painted on the webcomic, garnering even more ridicule, as it highlights the creators' flaws and shortcomings. Peter is the Wolf is the most condemnable and wretched implementation of a webcomic I have ever been witness to. Sergei Prokofiev is rolling in his grave.

9 comments:

  1. fuck you. thats all i have to say

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just because you cant make your own comic is not a reason to bitch about someone elses

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey, lay off the reviewer. Just because they didn't like it doesn't mean that you can't like it.

    They have a right to an opinion just the same as you do.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I personally agree with the reviewer. Peter is the Wolf is just one of those comics that if you like big werewolf sex with oversized genitals and huge boobs then you like it. But if every page of oversized out of perportion tits and cocks just makes you want to gack, where the storyline doesn't talk about anything other than werewolf sex, and you find that these things make you want to rech: Don't read it.
    Why review it then? Somebody has to.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Just because you cant make your own comic is not a reason to bitch about someone elses."

    Just because they can make a comic doesn't make it a reason not to exercise my fourth amendment rights to bitch about it, you dumbfuck furry porn pervert.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bro, the fourth amendment has to do with searches and seizures. I think you're thinking of the first.

    Otherwise, I agree with this review. I found this comic, and thought, "Hey, a well-drawn comic about werewolves!" Then... I was sorely disappointed...

    ReplyDelete
  7. It tries to be both a comic and a porn, but all that it manages to do is fail at both. The plot isn't interesting enough to keep readers satisfied, so really only the porn is worth watching. The porn is weak from the story distractions, therefore that too becomes disappointing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. what fucking plot? one has to -have- a plot before it can be advanced. they've just managed a half a decade of NOTHING, barely cohesive, gary-stu self inserts strung together by nuggets of shit they fell in love with back in the days when they played games from white wolf too much. this "comic" has no plot despite the fact every other page is TL;DR text bombs, no character evolution, no drama, no action to speak of and no porn to speak of past a garbled handful of panels that peter out (no pun intended) when the artist gets too excited and has to go calm the one eyed clown down. the "story" jumps around so much it's like a kid with ADD flipping channels on the television, they can't even keep shit together enough to carry a story-arc for more than half a dozen pages in a row but their schedule of "updates when-ever we fucking feel like it" as opposed to "every Wednesday!".

      Delete
  8. Just wanted to chime in unsolicited to mention that I think the mention of "SPEILBERG" is supposed to be a straight reference to MST3K, which would be "a scene of people looking at something." In MST3K's Summer Blockbuster Review special, and a few of their movies, they made several jokes about Speilberg's "trademark scenes of people looking at things." Pretty sure Summer Blockbuster Review is actually on youtube too, where they did a preview of The Lost World.

    Not that this even needed to be corrected or anything, especially seeing as this blog has been dead for a few years now, but I dunno, I just felt like bringing it up.

    ReplyDelete