![]() |
Peter is the Wolf (written by Kris Overstreet and drawn by Benjamin "BAR-1" Rodriguez) is, at its core, a tale about werewolfs. Werewolfs, it turns out, are simply the furry equivalent of vampires, which we all know is simply a ploy to seem more mysterious. Furries have an amazingly difficult time separating their professional life from their sex life, so it goes without saying that anything I link, despite being from the general audiences version, is probably not safe to view at work, lest you get fired from your job as an actuary/test pilot/terrible webcomic reviewer. Peter is the Wolf chronicles the adventures of a werewolf, not surprisingly named Peter, who unsuspectingly turns his girlfriend into a werewolf via unprotected sex. Invariably, she turns into a 12-foot-tall werewolfess, and since this is first and foremost a porn comic, her breasts are larger than seven of her heads. Peter, an abnormally small werewolf, has the only crotch in the world capable of calming her and reverting her to her mousy human form.
Yes, that's right, the most common way to turn a ten-ton titan back to a meek, minuscule maiden is through sexual intercourse. Granted, this is a furry porn comic, so I can't say I'm that surprised, but there IS a difference between writing a porn comic for your readers, and writing one for yourself. And if anyone is the intended audience for Peter is the Wolf, it's Overstreet and Rodriguez.
![]() |
As usual, there is nothing great to say about the art. Characters are wildly inconsistent, and that's just when they try to stay on model. When BAR-1 attempts a tense, wide-eyed shot, it only serves to creep readers right out. The intended expression of shock is submerged in a sea of distorted faces and strange viewing angles. The artist takes most of his artistic cues from popular anime characters, but it's obvious that he is more comfortable drawing wolf-men than humans, judging from how skewed his people end up looking. Again, I should not act surprised. The inconsistency of human characters could also be explained by the artist's excessive cribbing of 'manga' and anime sources, since comic characters will often change proportions, but only between different artists. If this artist is trying to emulate this effect, then he is decidedly worse than the ones who draw their comic right-to-left with tall skinny speech balloons, despite the native language being English. If this is not his intent, then a study of anatomy would be the standard prescription.
![]() |
The porn is blatantly obvious when you run into it, even in the "all-ages" version. Because the artist is lazy, he takes a shortcut--scaling the original image so that the "naughty bits" are out of frame, would work if not for one issue. Changes in resolution within an image are painfully obvious, and this kind of scaling creates a massive neon sign that says "THIS IS NOT RIGHT. SOMETHING IS WEIRD HERE." If the creators are committed to providing two versions of the comic, then they should be willing to redraw panels when necessary, instead of moving things around in Microsoft Picture Editor. While the writer could easily pull apart the important stuff and separate it from the smut, it really falls on both creators to treat both versions of their comic with the dignity it deserves. Why bother putting this stuff out there on the web if you're not going to put your best effort into it?
Personally I promised myself I would never review a porn comic, since its goals are generally not in line with my own. But when a webcomic makes an attempt to be both porn and not-porn, it has committed a violation so egregious that deserves ten times as much ridicule as it will ever receive. The use of furries is merely a giant fluorescent target painted on the webcomic, garnering even more ridicule, as it highlights the creators' flaws and shortcomings. Peter is the Wolf is the most condemnable and wretched implementation of a webcomic I have ever been witness to. Sergei Prokofiev is rolling in his grave.



fuck you. thats all i have to say
ReplyDeleteJust because you cant make your own comic is not a reason to bitch about someone elses
ReplyDeleteHey, lay off the reviewer. Just because they didn't like it doesn't mean that you can't like it.
ReplyDeleteThey have a right to an opinion just the same as you do.
I personally agree with the reviewer. Peter is the Wolf is just one of those comics that if you like big werewolf sex with oversized genitals and huge boobs then you like it. But if every page of oversized out of perportion tits and cocks just makes you want to gack, where the storyline doesn't talk about anything other than werewolf sex, and you find that these things make you want to rech: Don't read it.
ReplyDeleteWhy review it then? Somebody has to.
"Just because you cant make your own comic is not a reason to bitch about someone elses."
ReplyDeleteJust because they can make a comic doesn't make it a reason not to exercise my fourth amendment rights to bitch about it, you dumbfuck furry porn pervert.
Bro, the fourth amendment has to do with searches and seizures. I think you're thinking of the first.
ReplyDeleteOtherwise, I agree with this review. I found this comic, and thought, "Hey, a well-drawn comic about werewolves!" Then... I was sorely disappointed...
It tries to be both a comic and a porn, but all that it manages to do is fail at both. The plot isn't interesting enough to keep readers satisfied, so really only the porn is worth watching. The porn is weak from the story distractions, therefore that too becomes disappointing.
ReplyDeletewhat fucking plot? one has to -have- a plot before it can be advanced. they've just managed a half a decade of NOTHING, barely cohesive, gary-stu self inserts strung together by nuggets of shit they fell in love with back in the days when they played games from white wolf too much. this "comic" has no plot despite the fact every other page is TL;DR text bombs, no character evolution, no drama, no action to speak of and no porn to speak of past a garbled handful of panels that peter out (no pun intended) when the artist gets too excited and has to go calm the one eyed clown down. the "story" jumps around so much it's like a kid with ADD flipping channels on the television, they can't even keep shit together enough to carry a story-arc for more than half a dozen pages in a row but their schedule of "updates when-ever we fucking feel like it" as opposed to "every Wednesday!".
DeleteJust wanted to chime in unsolicited to mention that I think the mention of "SPEILBERG" is supposed to be a straight reference to MST3K, which would be "a scene of people looking at something." In MST3K's Summer Blockbuster Review special, and a few of their movies, they made several jokes about Speilberg's "trademark scenes of people looking at things." Pretty sure Summer Blockbuster Review is actually on youtube too, where they did a preview of The Lost World.
ReplyDeleteNot that this even needed to be corrected or anything, especially seeing as this blog has been dead for a few years now, but I dunno, I just felt like bringing it up.